- Cursor reports that Nvidia engineers now commit three times more code than before
- Nvidia maintains defect rates remained stable despite reported increase in production
- AI-assisted workflows contributed to DLSS 4 and smaller GPU die sizes
Nvidia has deployed generative AI tools across a large portion of its engineering workforce, with Cursor integrated into daily development workflows.
The company says more than 30,000 engineers now rely on this setup, and internal claims point to three times the code throughput of previous processes.
This claim has attracted attention in part because volume-based metrics have long been treated with caution within software engineering.
Productivity Claims Versus Engineering Reality
This implementation is an operational change that affects core software, including GPU drivers and infrastructure code that supports games, data centers, and AI training systems.
These products are widely considered mission-critical, where errors can have visible and sometimes costly consequences.
Nvidia claims that defect rates have remained stable despite the increase in production, suggesting that internal controls and testing requirements remain in place.
Driver code, firmware, and low-level system components typically undergo extensive validation before release, regardless of how quickly they are written.
This approach is not new, as Nvidia previously relied on AI-assisted workflows, including internal systems used to improve DLSS across multiple generations of hardware.
Some of Nvidia’s recent results are cited as examples of AI-backed development yielding tangible results.
DLSS 4 and reductions in GPU die size relative to comparable designs are often referred to as results tied to broader use of internal optimization tools.
These examples suggest that AI assistance, when applied in tightly controlled environments, can contribute to measurable improvements.
At the same time, Nvidia’s software stack has faced criticism in recent years, with users pointing to driver regressions and update-related issues across the industry.
Cursor also claims that coding is “a lot more fun than it used to be,” but this is accompanied by productivity figures that remain difficult to evaluate independently.
Lines of code committed over a given period have never been a reliable indicator of software quality, stability, or long-term value.
True software quality is best measured by stability, maintainability, and impact on end-user performance, and output volume alone says little about these aspects.
Nvidia also benefits commercially from promoting AI-driven development, given its central role in providing the hardware behind these systems.
In that context, skepticism around messaging and metrics is to be expected, even if the underlying tools offer real efficiencies in specific, tightly managed scenarios.
Follow TechRadar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to receive news, reviews and opinions from our experts in your feeds. Be sure to click the Follow button!
And of course you can also follow TechRadar on TikTok for news, reviews, unboxings in video form and receive regular updates from us on WhatsApp also.
