Islamabad:
As the cracks deepen within the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Bank, it expresses the visible discontent about the start of the regular bank of the contempt procedures, the legal experts believe that Judge Syed Mansoor Ali is caught between the internal struggles and the the External Malignant Forces.
The former additional attorney general Tariq Mahmood Khokhar believes that the presence of Judge Shah in the Bank has prompted fear in certain sectors.
“His nemesis is the illusion of the establishment. They are petrified that the judge of Puisne Mayor has an agenda,” Khokhar said.
Khokhar explained that certain forces believe that Judge Shah aims to undo the 26th amendment, cancel non -representative legislatures and order the rule of law, judicial independence and parliamentary democracy.
In addition, he noted that it was also anticipated that Judge Shah can deliver justice to the former Prime Minister Imran Khan and his conflict party, PTI. However, he pointed out that such fears were unlikely for an institution under their control.
He dismissed such notions, saying that Judge Shah is “neither a revolutionary nor seeks martyrdom or confrontation with the establishment.” Instead, he described him as “a man learned, honorable, honest, conscientious and decent impeccable integrity” committed to deliver justice according to his oath and the Constitution.
“We have a national or national tragedy, national or national tragedy
Farce based on delusions, “Khokhar added.
A defective strategy?
However, not all legal experts agree with Judge Shah’s approach to address issues related to the 26th constitutional amendment.
A senior lawyer, when choosing to remain in anonymity, criticized Judge Shah’s strategy, warning that he risked to alienate other judges instead of promoting unity.
“In my opinion, the strategy adopted by Judge Shah is defective. It will offend and divide the judges when they need to be united. There is also no reaction of lawyers or public pressure. In such matters, a well thought out strategy is essential is essential,” , said.
Meanwhile, some lawyers criticize the Constitutional Bank to cancel the judicial orders issued by the regular bank.
The lawyers claim that the efforts were underway to isolate Judge Shah within the SC, which potentially forced him to resign.
It is noteworthy that Judge Shah’s relationship with former CJP Qazi Faez Isa and his opinion of related ideas worsened after the reserved case trial. The ruling finally sealed the agreement on Judge Shah that was not appointed as the next CJP.
The majority of the former CJP ideas judges are now sitting at the Constitutional Bank, which further complicates things.
Several judges also lent their support to overcome the 26th amendment, which gave it a hand when he told.
The lawyer Asad Rahim Khan states that despite the introduction of strange committees within those worn by recent laws aimed at undermining judicial independence, Judge Syed Mansoor Ali Shah has issued an exceptionally well reasoned order. This order applies the precedent correctly, distinguishes between judges and administrators, and is meticulously based on the law.
“After a whole year to read the legally incoherent decisions of Qazi Faez Isa, an order of this quality feels like rain in the desert,” he said.
Khan also states that it has become evident to all random administrative directives cannot avoid judicial statements. While the case referred only to the jurisdiction, it should be taken into account that the crisis in progress will persist until the full bank resolves the fate of the amendment 26. The longer the executive is undecided as long as the Executive has for the judges to sign in mass to the superior courts, a trend that should not influence the case of amendment.
