Refresh
Depseek does not pass the marine meeting
The United States Navy has issued a new warning to sailors, warning of Deepseek AI due to “security and ethical concerns,” according to CNBC. It seems that the alert was issued by the US Navy. On Friday, January 24, 2025, which is a few days before the application finally stopped new records and experienced an interruption on Monday, January 27, 2025.
As reported by CNBC, the United States Navy warning says, “We would like to get your attention a critical update with respect to a new model of the call Depseek,” said email. The memorando said that it is “imperative” that team members do not use the AI DEPEEEK “for any task related to work or personal use.”
The US Navy confirmed the authenticity of the notice and referred to its generative policy of AI. The warning essentially equals a prohibition against Deepseek AI and its various models, instructing the recipients to “refrain, install or use the Deepseek model in any capacity.”
Apparently, the US Navy must have had its reasoning beyond the interruption and reported malicious attacks that beat Depseek ai three days later.
President Trump says Deepseek ai should be a ‘attention call’ for the US companies.
President Trump, just two weeks in his second term, has commented on Deepseek, saying: “The liberation of Deepseek ai of a Chinese company should be a attention call for our industries that we need to be focused on the laser to compete to win Because we have the best scientists in the world, “according to the Washington Post.
He described the launch of Deepseek AI as a “attention call”, added that competitors in the United States, potentially OpenAi, Nvidia and Google, must be “focused on the laser to win.” Trump’s comments were also probably a reflection of the impact of Deepseek News on the United States stock market. Most of the technological actions slid, but the leader of the AI GPU, Nvidia, had its worst registered day.
It is a non -surprising comment, but the follow -up statement was a bit more confusing since President Trump declared that Deepseek’s progress in a more efficient AI “could be positive because technology is now also available for US companies,” It is not exactly the case. However, since the newcomer of AI does not yet share those details and is a Chinese property company.
Nvidia calls Deepseek an ‘excellent advance of AI’
Beyond Sam Altman de Openai sharing his thoughts about Deepseek AI and promising much more of Chatgpt, Nvidia has also commented publicly, calling Deepseek an “excellent advance of AI.”
The response occurred after the record drop of $ 600 billion yesterday, the largest fall that the shares have seen and largely the result of the Deepseek yield and the cost of model AI. Beyond being impressed by R1, it is clear that Nvidia wants to remain a key part of the narrative.
The complete written statement is read, “Depseek is an excellent advance of AI and a perfect example of the test time scale. Deepseek’s work illustrates how new models can be created using that technique, taking advantage of widely available models and calculating that it meets export control. Inference requires a significant number of NVIDIA GPU and high performance networks. Now we have three scale laws: pre-training and post-training, which continue, and the new test time scale. “
Who really has Deepseek ai?
Deepseek was founded in mid -2010 by the Chinese manager of coverage funds Liang Wenfeng, who is the company’s CEO. Liang founded High-Flyer, a coverage fund that uses AI to create commercial strategies, in 2015, then, according to a Washington Post profile, he used that experience to develop large language models with his new Deepseek company.
How close are Depseek’s links with the Chinese government? Inevitably, the new success of AI application has attracted a lot of new attention, but apparently it has not always been considered a star of the A -one within China.
According to Matt Sheehan (an expert in the China’s industry cited in the profile of the Washington Post), Depseek “was not the ‘chosen’ of the new companies of China” and that “he took the world by surprise, and I think that To a large extent, they took the Chinese government by surprise. “
But Deepseek is now far from being unknown, and it will be interesting to see if it distances itself from the Chinese government or not to calm those growing fears of privacy.
Is it safe to use Deepseek?
We have made our own in -depth comparison of how Deepseek is compared to Chatgpt, but since then some privacy alarms on the application have been sounded.
As the BBC pointed out, Australia’s Minister of Sciences, Ed Husic, told ABC News the day there are many unanswered questions about “Data and Privacy Management” with Deepseek. “It would be very careful about it, this type of problem must be careful,” he warned.
Deepseek’s privacy policy is quite open that “we store the information we collect in safe servers located in the People’s Republic of China.” That information includes your email address, telephone number, date of birth and chat stories.
None of this is very different from the privacy policies of ChatGPT or Gemini, but the harvest of that information in China, and the fact that it is combined with “actions that have taken out of the service” of the advertisers, is obliged to maintain Those alarm rings are stronger in the next few days.
Will Deepseek exaggeration last?
The editor of Techradar, Lance Ulanoff, has written a great demolition of Deepseek’s exaggeration, questioning whether the chatbot, which is not yet multimodal, is worthy of the inches inch that it is receiving and (reasonably) suggesting that it is unlikely not Be ultimately probable in the United States, given the recent Tiktok problems.
When commenting on the falls of the price of Nvidia shares and others, it points out “almost without information or real evidence that Deepseek and its investors are being transparent and sincere, investors have begun to extract their dollars from the value of the stock market the United States “.
Even if we accept that Depseek is a great advance, there are understandable interrogation signs about its longevity in the United States. As Lance Ulanoff states “no matter how good it is; this application will not survive in the current American climate.”
Sam Altman from OpenAi responds
Sam Altman de Openai has now publicly commented on Depseek for the first time, declaring on X (previously Twitter) that the AI model is “impressive”, and I cannot avoid listening to that with Patrick Bateman’s voice in the American Psychopath Presentation card scene.
But it was also typically optimistic about Openai’s response, stating that “we will obviously deliver much better models” and that it is “legitimate stimulating to have a new competitor.” Altman also does not believe that the news changes the image in terms of chips, stating that “more computation is more important now than ever to succeed in our mission.”
The markets do not seem to agree, with the giant of the manufacture of Nvidia chips that suffers the highest market value of a day in the history of the United States yesterday.
A fast Speeek review
A little confused about Deepseek? Here is a quick primer. The free the chatbot was actually launched on January 20, but has exploded in popularity in recent days as technology fans realized their importance. As Risk capitalist Marc Andreessen pointed out in X (previously Twitter), “Deepseek R1 is the Sputnik moment of AI.”
The application is currently at the top of the free graphics in the Apple APP Store and Play Store in the United States and in many other countries, despite being carried out in China, which was subject to a commercial prohibition of advanced chips of people like Nvidia.
Ironically, it is those commercial restrictions that seem to have caused the ingenuity behind Depseek, which was created using a small amount of the enormous computing power that is behind the main models of today’s.
Reference tests show that you can perform tasks such as answering questions and generating code, as well as current main models. However, you may have problems creating a Deepseek account: it was forced to stop its records after an important cyber attack.
