- Goal makes its border framework available for all
- The company says that it is concerned about cyber security threats induced by AI-AI
- Risk evaluations and modeling will classify AI models as criticism, high or moderate
Meta has revealed some concerns about the future of AI despite the well -advertised intentions of the CEO Mark Zuckerberg to make all artificial general intelligence (AGI) available to all.
The recently launched border framework explores some “critical” risks that AI could raise, including its possible implications in cybersecurity and chemical and biological weapons.
By making their guidelines publicly available, Meta hopes to collaborate with other industry leaders to “anticipate and mitigate” such risks identifying possible “catastrophic” results and threat models to establish thresholds.
Declaing: “The AI of open supply is not optional; It is essential, “was described in a blog post how to share research helps organizations to learn from the evaluations of others and encourage innovation.
Its frame works proactively executing the periodic threat modeling exercises to complement its risk assessments of AI: the modeling will also be used if an AI model is identified to “exceed current border capabilities”, where it becomes a threat .
These processes are informed by internal and external experts, resulting in one of the three negative categories: ‘critical’, where the development of the model must stop; ‘Alto’, where the model in its current state should not be released; and ‘moderate’, where the release strategy is considered more consideration.
Some threats include the discovery and exploitation of zero day vulnerabilities, automated scams and fraud and the development of high impact biological agents.
Within the framework, Meta writes: “While the approach to this framework is in our efforts to anticipate and mitigate the risks of catastrophic results, it is important to emphasize that the reason to develop advanced AI systems in the first place is due to the tremendous potential. for benefits for the society of these technologies. “
The company has pledged to update its framework with the help of academics, policy formulators, civil society organizations, governments and the most wide community as technology continues to develop.
