LAHORE:
Former Prime Minister Imran Khan has once sought early hearings of his bail requests after arrest in eight cases filed against him following May 9, 2023 Vandalism incidents.
In his application, he has expressed concerns about the non -appearance of prosecutors before the Court during cases of cases and the dissolution of a bank constituted previously to listen to their bail supplications.
The petition filed on behalf of Imran Khan by his lawyer Barríster Sallman Safdar declared that the founder of PTI submitted a miscellaneous civil application for an early hearing of his bail on March 18, but none of the plaintiffs or fiscal appeared on the scheduled date.
He said that a LHC division bank was scheduled to listen to the bail statement after Imran arrest on March 24, but the bank dissolved at the eleventh hour and the list of causes of bail supplications was canceled.
Imran said that the Anti -Terror Court (III) in Lahore has confirmed its bail prior to the arrest in two cases related to May disturbances followed by the concession of bonds after arrest in four cases.
“The observations of the LHC and Judge ATC (III) and Judge ATC (I), Rawalpindi are sufficient reasons to grant bond to the petitioner in a case manufactured by ‘political rivals’,” said the petition.
He said that both orders, which address the same accusations, remain in force and have not been revoked by the Superior Court. “The instantaneous matter must be heard quickly, since the petitioner has convincing and convincing reasons to grant after arrest bonds,” he added
Meanwhile, the judge of LHC, Khalid Ishaq, is expected to be maintained on April 7 in additional procedures on a statement in search of the implementation of the order of July 12 of the Supreme Court with respect to the granting of seats reserved for the PTI in the National Assembly.
The petitioner Munir Ahmed presented this peel through the lawyer Azhar Siddique requesting the court to order the interested rooms to implement the SC ruling that resurrected the PTI as a parliamentary part.
Siddique argued that despite the clear decision of the SC, the Pakistan Electoral Commission (ECP) has not yet issued any notification regarding the allocation of seats reserved to the part “that equals contempt of the Court.”
“The ECP is not implementing the decision as indicated in article 189 of the Constitution for which article 204 is already in its place. At the same time, the LHC has the jurisdiction in view of article 187 (2) of the Constitution to implement the decision or enforce it,” he added.
Meanwhile, a Bank of LHC reserved an order in a petition filed against the detention law. The president of the Court, Aalia Neelum, presided over the hearing on a petition presented by Zainab Umair.
