NEWNow you can listen to Pak Gazette articles!
The representative of the state of Maine, Laurel Libby, can vote for his voters after three months of being censored, thanks to a decision of the Supreme Court of 7-2 on Tuesday.
After the State Democratic majority voted to strip Libby of their voting rights in February for making a position on social networks that called a biologically trans athlete who won a girl’s jumping competition of girls, fought a legal battle to revoke him to the Supreme Court. And it was worth the decision on Tuesday.
Libby described the battle as a case of ‘civil rights’ in an interview with Pak Gazette Digital.
“I certainly believe that this is a civil rights problem for Maine’s girls and girls throughout the country that are on the sidelines for biological men,” Libby said, and then added that censorship “was political reprisals from beginning to end,” about their vocal position on the inclusion of trans athletes.
CLICK HERE for more sports coverage at Foxnews.com
Libby believes that the ruling is essential to protect Americans who want to speak against allowing trans athletes in girls and women’s sports, while the country is in a fundamental confrontation on the subject.
The main defendant in the demand for Libby, the president of the House of Representatives of Maine, Ryan Fecteau, who approved censorship against Libby on February 15, has promised to restore Libby’s vote rights to comply with the ruling of the Supreme Court.
“According to the court order of the Supreme Court pending the appeal, the ability of the Libby representative to vote on the floor of the Chamber has been restored until the current appeal process continues its course,” FECTEAU told Pak Gazette Digital. “The secretary of the house, with whom the court order is, has already complied with this ruling from the Court. We hope to continue with the important work that Maine’s people expect from us.”
President Donald Trump has signed an executive order that requires that states only allow women to compete, but multiple states administered by Democrats, including Maine, have challenged the order and continued allowing trans inclusion.
The Department of Justice and the Attorney General of the United States, Pam Bondi, have even filed their own separate lawsuit against the State of Maine for continuing to challenge the order.
Maine shaken by the mastery of the trans athlete on the girls track at the meeting in the midst of continuous legal conflict with Trump
Libby has been a central figure in conservative rejection against Democratic policies that allow trans inclusion in girls in Maine. In addition to his lawsuit against Fecteau, Libby has been repeatedly critical with Mills for his refusal to comply with Trump.
“Ryan Fecteau and Janet Mills have been ruling our state for the last six years with an iron fist regardless of Maine’s will,” Libby said. “This sends a message that they cannot continue to operate outside the Constitution and ignore the will of Maine’s people for longer.”
TO survey The coalition of American parents discovered that about 600 registered voters of Maine, 63% said that school sports participation should be based on biological sex, and 66% agreed that it is “just restricting women’s sports to biological women.”
Many Maine residents even have entire school districts have faced Mills’s policies along with Libby. The school districts of Maine RSU No. 24 and MSAD No. 70 have approved their own resolutions located to keep the places for girls only for students. There have also been three large -scale protests against current policies in the state capital, Augusta, since February.
Maine’s adolescents fighting state democrats in the Girls Sports Law project after supporting trans athlete chaos in high school
And Libby has had the support of the federal government along the way.
A few days before the decision, the Department of Justice presented an Amicus letter on behalf of Libby to the Supreme Court, and Bondi spoke in support of Pak Gazette Digital legislator.
“I am very grateful for the response of Attorney General Pam Bondi,” Libby said.
However, Libby’s legal battle has not yet been carried out.
The decision of the Supreme Court has granted him his right to vote on the floor of the House of Representatives, but he still has no right to speak. The case of Libby will now return to the First Court of Circuit Appeals for Oral Arguments on June 5, as it will seek to recover its voting rights.
File -State Rep. Laurel Libby, R -Auburn, talk to a colleague, on February 14, 2023, at the house of the state of Augusta, Maine. (AP Photo/Robert F. Bukaty, Archive)
In addition, Libby could not vote on several bills in the state legislature in the last three months during its censorship. These included the biannual biannual vote of the State and a bill to encode Maine’s Human Rights Law, which protects trans inclusion in girls sports, to the constitution of the State.
Libby said he believes that records should be reflected to include their vote on these bills as well, but it still does not know if she will actively seek that these records change legally yet.
