The current row between Prince Harry and his beneficial organization, SinEbale has just received another update.
According to him New York Post, The beneficial organization founded in 2006 together with the four -year prince of Lesotho aims to help young children with HIV.
However, in recent months, its former president, Dr. Sophie Chandauka, faced the Duke, and the administrator accused them of poor management and racism.
However, in a more recent movement, it is said that the organization demands a public clarification that they are not specifically examining accusations of racism or misogyny against the Duke.
Sources close to the Duke have even presented themselves by calling everything that is not “simply provocative, it is unfortunate.” Since they are only “remarking the accusations without foundation of bullying, misogyny and more”, saying that their last movement is not, “according to Sky News.
A source close to the organization also said: “We have written to the charity commission that states that the responsibility is in the Commission to reaffirm for the registration that individual accusations of harassment have not been investigated or addressed in the commission report.”
A separate source in the corner of Prince Harry also pointed out a flagrant change in the behavior of Dr. Chandauka for “yesterday, Mrs. Chanduaka was applauding the findings of the charity commission, but today, after a burst of little flattering holders, returns to the couple. Issuing another state air”.
“Withdrawing the unbalanced accusations of bullying, misogyny and more, of which the commission found no evidence and dressed as veiled threats is not only provocative, it is unfortunate.”
They also demand that she “explain” all her concerns, or “better yet, redirects their energy towards something really valuable, such as raising money for children to support.”
As a result, the beneficial organization also issued a statement, The post Saying: “We have issued the beneficial organization with an action plan that establishes the steps that current trusts must take to improve governance weaknesses and rectify the bad management findings. Now we urge all involved to leave behind their differences and allow the beneficial organization to focus on their work and beneficiaries.”
