- AMD threadripper pro 9995Wx Outpaces Intel Xeon W9-3495X significantly in Premiere Pro Benchmarks
- The video edition of PC work loads benefits from the highest central density of AMD and sustained performance
- Profits measured in Davinci resolution and subsequent effects highlight the content creation force of Threadripper
AMD’s Threadripper Pro 9000WX series has hit that the CPUs of Intel’s Xeon workstation cannot recover.
The Puget Systems reference points that cover real-world content creation applications found that the new Threadripper chips beat Intel’s Xeon W-3500 series in almost all categories, often by wide margins that left little space for excuses or refutals.
In the upper part of the AMD battery is the 96 9995WX centers, with a price of $ 11,700, delivering a multiple cinebench 2024 score of 7,508, 27% ahead of the 7995Wx of previous generation and a promoted 125% faster than the most powerful Xeon of Intel tested.
Threadripper is advanced?
Even the 9975WX of ABD Middle Rank with 32 cores ($ 4,100) exceeded W9-3595X of 60 Intel cores in work loads such as Blender, Davinci Resolve and unreal Engine Compiling.
Intel’s best could simply not keep up, either in gross performance or watch speed, it often seemed inefficient compared.
In Photoshop, where it is important that the high speed of a single nucleus, the 99555 of 16 AMD cores came out at the top with a general score of 11,384, while the Xeon W5-3535x of Intel achieved only 6,801, just 60% of the best performance of AMD.
Even the weakest chip of Threadripper 9000 proven exceeded each CPU Intel in all areas in the set of adobe creative tools, including Premiere Pro and After Effects.
In the 3D AFTER Effects workloads, 9955WX dominated again with a 9% advantage over 9995WX and a 40% advantage over Intel’s best performance.
Davinci Resolve further emphasized the Intel problem: 9975Wx obtained 180 in intraframe processing, a 10% improvement on the previous generation of AMD, while Xeons was delayed in more than 20%.
The reference points related to AI using flame.CPP showed a scale consisting of AMD, with the 9995Wx processing 16% more tokens per second than their predecessor.
Intel’s Xeon pieces even followed the lower level Threadripper models here, which further underlines their inefficiency in modern workloads.
Workstation tasks such as compilation in Visual Studio or the shadowy building in a unreal engine showed predictable trends.
The 9995WX and 9985WX completed these dramatically faster tasks, with the old Unreal motor compilation in 68% of the time required by the previous generation.
Intel’s xoons simply could not compete; Even its 60 -core chip was surpassed by the offer of 32 AMD nuclei.
Although AMD processors come with a 10-20% price increase on the 7000WX line, the increase in performance and DDR5-6400 support helps justify it.
In almost all tests, AMD’s domain was clear and systematic, leaving Intel’s Xeon series with an outdated and too expensive appearance.
