Karachi:
The Super Court of Sindh (SHC) on Tuesday fell strongly on the control authority of the Sindh (SBCA) building on its inaction against illegal construction in the metropolis, qualifying it as “the most notorious institution of the government” and ordered that you present a compliance report before September 16.
The bank said in his comments that a special well in hell could be waiting for corrupt SBCA officers to allow illegal structures, knowing that the building could collapse and kill residents.
A two -member bank, headed by Judge Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, was listening to a petition against illegal construction in Ramzanabad, Garden West. The lawyer of the petitioner, Farjad Ali Khan, said that only more terrestrial structures were allowed in the area, but a land building had been raised more than four years, where commercial activities were also being carried out, in violation of the zoning laws.
The officials of the Karachi Metropolitan Corporation (KMC) and SBCA appeared in the court of compliance with the previous orders. When asked what measures had been taken since the construction of the building in 2000, the director of SBCA said that the matter had come to his knowledge and now he would act on the courts of the court.
The bank expressed a strong disgust for the answer. “Will you not do your work? Why is there a need for a court order? If someone dies, let them die, if the court orders, he will work,” said Judge Kalhoro. In addition, he observed: “His work is just to make money under the table. Sbca is the most notorious institution of the government. There will be a special place in hell for SBCA officers.”
The court ordered the SBCA to take measures against illegal construction and present an implementation report at the next hearing.
LPG points of sale in residential area
The Sindh Superior Court (SHC) eliminated a request against the operation of the Petroleum Liquefied Gas (LPG) on the residential area of the Delhi neighborhood after being informed that the stores had been closed.
The petition, presented by the lawyer Irfan Aziz, declared that the presence of LPG stores in a densely populated town represented a serious risk of accidents, which could cause damage to the residents in case of a setback.
During the hearing, the government lawyer presented a report informing the court that two insecure GLP stores had been sealed, while a warning had been issued to comply with the SOP. Subsequently, the merchants had closed their businesses and presented sworn statements to that sense.
The petitioner also argued that commercial points of sale could not be built on residential plots. However, the bank observed: “Don’t say that, stores have been built everywhere.”
Observing that the main complaint of the petitioner had been addressed, the court eliminated the matter.
