- The new agentic manus ia tool is being acclaimed as more capable than agents previously available
- Others are less impressed, citing accidents and hallucinations, while experts ask for caution
- A use case gallery shows that Manus is being used to plan trips and analyze actions
Manus, a new ‘agent’ tool of the China Monica startup, has entered a preview only by invitation and, according to some users, “,”[redefines] Which is possible “so that automated workflows reach it.
That is according to a Twitter user who asked Manus to “codify a three -year game in which you control a plane” and “ended up concluding that Manus is the most impressive AI tool I have tried.”
The manus use cases itself (through Techcrunch) presents some of the possibilities, such as planning a trip and producing a personalized guide for a trip to Japan, accessing a database to classify information in the tables, analyze the stocks on a board of humans and schedule interviews of candidates for candidates without intervention of a real person.
What are AI agents?
AI’s ‘agents’, although driven by large language models (LLM), differ from AI writers in which they use systems to automate a workflow based on a user’s notice, instead of producing a single output piece.
Manus offers nothing especially new, although it is remarkable that, until now, perhaps, AI agents have not had the best reputation; Known for fighting with objective information, and basically is not functional.
Others, however, are not so impressed. TechcrunchKyle’s Wiggers gave a cohesive account of their experience, informing clashes and failures in tasks ranging from simple (booking a table in a restaurant) to the complicated (“then I asked the platform to build a fighting game inspired by Naruto)”.
Comparisons have also been made with the LLM of Deepseek, although these do not join at all. Manus and Depseek could resort to China, but Deepseek is not an agent, and Manus is not open source, and in fact it does not have a launch schedule. That said, an open source version, Openmanus, is active.
Manus from a Chinese startup has caused restlessness, with some circles, Axios Notes, worrying about China is gaining ground in a call “career for the supremacy of AI”.
Experts doubt manus
Two industry figures told Techradar Pro that their doubts surrounding the agent still remain. The CEO of Corpara.ai, Mel Morris, said that “Manus de Manus shows the potential of the Agent as a significant step ahead. However, granting autonomous agents such as Manus the ability to perform independent actions raises serious concerns.”
“We have already witnessed numerous examples of the generative and the so -called reasoning models that produce defective exits. If autonomy is given on high -risk tasks, such as buying and selling shares, such imperfections could lead to chaos. The ability to compare the fundamentals of shares and commercial activity in minutes is very different from successfully navigating market complexities. “
Similarly, the co -founder and CEO of Copyleaks, Alon Yamin, said that: “While innovation in AI can promote remarkable efficiency, it also amplifies concerns about transparency, data security and responsible supervision. Manus cloud -based operations produce several critical questions about the data government: Who controls the information? Where does it reside? How do the data protect?
“As IA systems become more autonomous, ethical development and regulatory alignment must be prioritized. The governance solutions of AI that help organizations to detect and mitigate the risks of AI remain critical, ensuring that progress as manus ai unfolds in a responsible and transparent way. “
