PAC of the industry continues to add allies such as the Congress of Cryptographic Legislation


The political financing arm of the cryptocurrency industry, the imposing financing entity of the campaign known as Fireshake, launched another $ 1 million in the coffers of a candidate for the special elections he hoped to replace a Virginia Democrat who died in office, representative Gerald Connolly.

JWP-Player-Lugarholder

The candidate favored by the main political action committee of the industry, James Walkinshaw, won the elementary calls of the Democrats Fire House during the weekend, in which the party conducted its own surveys to determine its candidate chosen between a nine field. The general election to formally select the next member of the Congress of the Fairfax County region is scheduled for September 9, although the Democratic head took about two thirds of the vote in the regular elections last year, giving Walkinshaw a great advantage.

“We hope that James will join the growing bipartisan coalition in Congress that includes the importance of ensuring the leadership of the United States in the next generation of technology,” said Josh Vlasto, a Fireshake spokesman, in a statement. He argued that the race again showed that the electorate does not move for critics trying to tarnish candidates who show support for the sector and are backed by their campaign resources, as at least one of the Walkinshaw opponents tried to do.

Fairshake (and his affiliate Super PACS, defend US jobs and protect progress) It was highlighted in the Congress elections of 2024, since it accumulated a huge war chest of the main digital asset businesses, including Coinbase, Ripple and A16z. He dedicated his campaign spending on huge fragments that in some cases eclipsed what the opponents of the group chosen candidates. As a result, Fairshake added a long list of winners to the ranks of the cryptographic supporters of Congress in those elections, but has continued their strategy in special elections as the unique competitions seek to fill unoccupied seats such as Connolly’s.

In the case of Walkinshaw, the former Chief of Cabinet of Connolly, the expense came from the protection progress, which focuses on the Democratic candidates. While his former boss had routinely voted against cryptography problems, Walkinshaw’s campaign site says the candidate favors a “hug of the next technology generation”, including Blockchain, which the campaign said “can reduce the administrative costs of companies and the lowest rates for consumers.”

“Congress must establish modern and risk -based regulatory frameworks that support responsible innovation and prevent abuse,” according to the Walkinshaw website.

The Super Pac still has about $ 116 million available as the electoral cycle of Congress 2026 approaches next year, Vlasso said. The current members of the Congress that supported the last round are already working on the main cryptography bill that has been advancing this year.

Fairshake makes massive “independent expenses” in political races, which means that your external money buys advertising without approval or communication of the candidate. Although it represents cryptographic interests, advertising bought by the group almost never mentions the issue of digital assets, instead of focusing on any political point it is more likely to obtain a victory.

Read more: Crypto’s Fairshake notches last victories in the races of Florida Congress



Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *