Pakistan hits Modi’s speech as dangerous and driven by hate

Pakistan condemned recent comments by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi as “reckless provocation” and a threat to regional peace.

Giving a speech in Gujarat one day before, Modi had said: “Pakistan’s people must appear to free their country of terrorism. His youth will have to appear.”

“Live a life of peace, eat your bread or [choose my] Bullet, “he added. Modi then about the progress of India, saying that the country has passed to Japan to become the fourth largest economy in the world. He then attacked Pakistan, saying:” India believes in tourism, but Pakistan sees terrorism as tourism. That is dangerous to the world. ”

Modi also said that the Indian forces had destroyed the Pakistani air bases after the attacks in the past and when Pakistan was made to civilians in May, India responded with twice the force.

By reacting to comments, the Pakistan Foreign Ministry has expressed its regret for the “continuous erosion of maturity and decorum in Indian crafts.”

Modi’s speech was “pronounced in Gujarat with the theatrical flowering of a campaign manifestation instead of the expected sobriety of the leader of a nuclear armed state,” said the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in his statement.

“The invocation of violence driven by hate in your comments is deeply disturbing, not only for its content but for the dangerous precedent established in the region already loaded with volatility,” FO added.

“These comments violate the principles of the United Nations Charter,” he told FO. “Member States are obliged to solve disputes peacefully and refrain from the threat or use of force.”

In addition, Modi’s comments are an attempt to distract from what he described as ongoing human rights abuses and demographic changes in Jammu and Kashmir (iiojk) illegally occupied.

READ: Pakistan’s army rules out the threat of Indian water as “crazy thought”

Pakistan’s contributions to the maintenance of UN peace and global efforts against terrorism “speak stronger than any hostile sound,” the FO maintained, accusing the Indian government of promoting extremism through “majority, religious intolerance and the systematic loan of minorities.”

Reiterating its commitment to sovereign peace and equality, Islamabad warned that any threat to its security would be fulfilled with a “firm and proportionate” response, citing article 51 of the UN Charter.

Islamabad urged the international community to take note of what it described as the “growing rhetoric” of India, which said undermine regional stability and the perspective of lasting peace.

India-Pakistan conflict

The last climb between Pakistan and India began on April 22, when an attack in the city of Pahalgam of Iiojk Resort killed 26 people. India immediately blamed Pakistan for the incident, despite not providing public evidence.

In response, India carried out a series of hostile actions the next day of April 23, including the suspension of the 65-year-old Indus Water Treaty (IWT), canceling the visas for Pakistani citizens, closing the border crossing of Wagah-Attari, ordering the closure of Pakistan’s high commission in New Delhi, and reduction of the diplomatic staff of the crosses.

Pakistan strongly rejected the accusation, qualifying it without foundation, but took reciprocal measures through its National Security Committee (NSC). These included stopping the trade with India, closing the Pakistani airspace to the Indian aircraft and other contracts.

Tensions intensified even more in the early hours of May 7, when missile attacks hit six cities in Punjab and Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK), destroying a mosque and killing dozens of civilians, including women, children and elders.

In a rapid military response, the armed forces of Pakistan knocked down Indian combat planes, including three Rafale aircraft, widely considered as a key asset of the Indian Air Force. During the next two days, India launched waves of Israeli manufacturing drones, which were also neutralized by the Pakistan army.

The confrontation intensified again in the early hours of May 10, when India attacked several Pakistani air bases with missile attacks. In retaliation, Pakistan launched the Bunyanum Marsoos operation, damaging Indian military facilities, including missile storage sites, air bases and other strategic objectives.

For Saturday night, the president of the United States, Donald Trump, announced that the fire had been reached after intense diplomatic efforts during the night. Minutes later, the agreement was confirmed separately by the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Pakistan, Ishaq Dar, and the Secretary of Foreign Affairs of India.

But despite the high military fire, the war of narratives has fought.

While Pakistan publicly accredited the president of the United States, Donald Trump, together with China and the Gulf states, for playing a vital role in the disable of tensions, India minimized foreign participation.

Indian officials have insisted that the truce was the result of direct bilateral conversations.

However, Trump has reiterated his position twice after the initial announcement.