The main leadership of the Popular Party of Pakistan (PPP) praised on Tuesday Pakistan’s response to the recent Indian aggression, qualifying it as diplomatic and military success, and reaffirmed the commitment of the party with the national unity and the theme of Kashmir.
At a joint press conference, the leaders of the PPP, Nayyar Hussain Bukhari, Sherry Rehman and Nadeem Afzal Chan, said that Pakistan had demonstrated strength and resolution during the recent three -day confrontation, which included the fall of Indian airplanes and drones.
Sherry Rehman recognized the role of international efforts in reducing the conflict, accrediting the president of the United States, Donald Trump and other diplomatic partners with facilitating high fire.
“Pakistan is still committed to peace, but he will defend his sovereignty when he challenges himself,” he said.
Nayyar Bukhari said that India could not unilaterally revoke the Treaty of Indo’s waters and requested a unified approach in both external threats and internal challenges.
He praised the government’s response and highlighted the international commitment of the president of the PPP, Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, during the crisis.
Nadeem Afzal Chan referred to the last speech of the Indian Prime Minister, Narendra Modi, as a reflection of strategic failure, stating that he revealed “frustration and withdrawal.”
He added that Pakistan’s unit had counteracted efforts to sow political division.
The PPP reaffirmed its support for the Armed Forces and requested a continuous national solidarity in issues of sovereignty and cashmere.
The high the fire of India-Pakistan follows the climb, but the fragile calm persists
A high and immediate fire between India and Pakistan was announced on May 10 after days of intense military exchanges that took both neighbors with nuclear weapons to the edge of the war.
The announcement was made for the first time by the president of the United States, Donald Trump, and then confirmed by Pakistan Prime Minister, Shehbaz Sharif, the Vice Prime Minister Ishaq Dar, the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the India, S. Jaishankar, and the Secretary of State of the United States Marco Rubio.
Tensions exploded after a April 22 attack in Pahalgam, India illegally occupied Jammu and Kashmir (Iiojk), which left 26 dead civilians.
India blamed the elements based in Pakistan without presenting any evidence, and Islamabad rejected the accusations. In response, India closed the border with Wagah, revoked the visas and suspended the Treaty of Indo’s waters, moves Pakistan called a “act of war.”
The conflict intensified with the missile attacks in India and drone raids when he launched his Sindoor operation.
Pakistan’s army launched Operation Bunyan-Un-Marshals in retaliation, and announced that it had demolished five Indian airplanes, including raffles, and intercepted 77 Harop drones made by Israeli.
After the diplomatic intervention directed by Washington, both parties agreed to stop military activity in land, air and sea. However, hours after the truce, fresh skirmishes were reported along both sides of the control line.
Explosions were heard in Srinagar, and officials cited fire exchanges on both sides, which raised concerns about the durability of the high fire.
The Foreign Ministry of Pakistan reiterated its commitment to the high fire while accusing India of violations.
DG ISPR Lieutenant General Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry emphasized that Pakistan had not requested the truce, stating that India had initiated the request to stop fire after Pakistan retaliation strikes. He described the war between two nuclear powers as “inconceivable” and “an absurd.”
Chaudhry confirmed that no Indian pilot was in Pakistani custody, dismissing viral claims such as misinformation.
He called Operation Bunyan-Un-Marsosos a unified national response to Indian aggression, noting that Pakistan had fulfilled his commitments to respond decisively and proportionally.
The cities of all Pakistan observed Yom-E-Tashakkur (day of thanks) on Sunday to mark what was acclaimed nationally as a successful defense of national sovereignty.
