After the meeting of King Charles with Prince Harry, the revelations came to light regarding the intentions of the Duke.
While the statements claim that the Duke wants to “help” his older brother, a source states that they “went to bed years” because he is “very happy with his life in California.” As well as “just visiting the United Kingdom as and when to support their sponsorships and causes.”
Later, the feelings also echoed a spokesman who said: “The Duke has made it clear that; the approach has to be in his father, beyond that, and in any other issue in relation to his family, we will not comment.”
For those without versions with the comments that brought all this forward, when Megxit’s conversations were underway, conversations were exchanged about an agreement of “half adercure and a half” where the Sussexes could earn their own money and also attend some real commitments a year.
However, that proposal had been rejected at that time, and it seems that King Charles is also firm in the decisions of his late mother. Leading a source to present and say The Daily Mail“Who is behind them seems to have confused a brief tea and a portion of cake with the Versailles treaty.”
Because “these syrup sessions of the alleged sources of Sussex are precisely why the king and the royal family doubt so much in embarking on any way to the approach.”
The reason is “if the intention is to encourage a reconstruction of trust and relationships, they serve to the precise opposite effect.”
“As clearly demonstrated the state visit of last week, the power and impact of the modern monarchy are in the unwavering link between the king and the prince of Wales, with the support of other family working members.”
The statement that instigated all this was a report of The telegraph That stated: “The king has been absolutely clear in defending the decision of his late mother that there cannot be a public role” in the middle, medium out for family members. “
