Meghan Markle seems to have taken her husband in the face of large amounts of roasting and questioning, which also about her participation in intimidation investigation, as well as her own loyalties.
All this has been claimed by commentator Real Richard Fitzwilliams.
Shared his thoughts in a piece for him Daily mail That questioned the prince’s silence at a time when the accusations of Meghan’s roads were launched.
It all started with the writer wondering what agreement Jason Knauf could have reached with Prince William to register with 60 minutes of Australia and make a dish in the bullying probe.
According to Mrs. Amanda Platell, in her piece for the Daily Mail, “was this a clear excavation to Harry that millions of becoming their alleged complaints against the royals and in the terrible way they had treated his wife ‘suicide’?
“A wife who begged ‘not only to survive but prosper’?” Mrs. Platell wondered.
Because “can it be really pure coincidence that Knauf’s interview has resurrected, although obliquely, the ugly spectrum of Meghan’s alleged harassment by saying that he did not regret it”? On the eve of your return from Netflix? She questioned.
After all, the first filtration against Meghan appeared before the launch of his Oprah Winfrey interview, and this time he arrived a few days before the launch of his Netflix cooking program, With Love, Meghan.
He led the same writer to ask Prince Harry directly and ask: “Why the Sussexes did not sue.”
After all, “Harry hasten to resort to court on his personal safety, for accusations of being pirate by phone, so why didn’t he demand for the reputation of his sweet wife?”
