- Qobuz has published its average transmission rates
- Many rivals talk about the total, not of individual rights holders.
- With just over 1.8 ¢ per transmission, Qobuz pays more than most
The Qobuz transmission service has done something that none of its rivals has been willing to do so far: it is said how much it pays for the transmission, and has also examined its claims independently.
Posting verified figures independently is the first time that an industry that prefers to talk about the general landscape instead of small details, and is a very welcome development not only for artists, but for anyone who tries to be careful with the impact of their money.
According to Qobuz, in fiscal year 2024 he paid an average of US $ 0.01873 per transmission.
That money does not go directly to the artists: the streamers pay the rights owners, generally record companies and music editors; What artists really get on that depends on how good or bad are their agreements with those rights rights, but it is a significantly higher average rate than other serpentines they pay.
1.8 Cents per transmission may not sound like much, but Apple, one of the best payers, says it averages 1.0 cents. It is believed that other serpentines pay considerably less and offer reduced royalties in exchange for exposure.
Opinion: It’s great to see the rates, yes!
It is not exactly easy in today’s world, but many people try to buy quite ethically where they can, and knowing how much money artists are paid is useful if, like me, you want to support people who make the music you love so much.
That is particularly true if the artists you love are not Megastars: 1,000 plays in Qobuz pay an average of $ 18.73, which is not much. But it costs $ 18.73 more than what the owner of the rights obtains in other services. And that definitely makes me feel even more positive about Qobuz.
Transparency is something that I like to see, and it is definitely a factor in the sites and services that I choose to use. For example, I use more and more bookshop.org and book.fm for deliveries and audiobooks of my books because I like how they work with independent libraries and how transparent they are on who gets what.
The sums are not much, I know, but it is good to know that even when I cannot reach my favorite book corner, I can still throw some money in its own way instead of making a corporation even more effective.
Of course, people choose, or choose to avoid, the best music transmission services for all kinds of reasons. But with everyone essentially offering the same songs, this is another way in which transmission companies can differentiate themselves from their rivals telling what type of company they are. More, please.
