Rahul’s ‘surrender’ comment attracts a fierce bjp reaction.
Sudhanshu Trivedi calls the leader of INC “Rahul Munir” and “Rahul Sharif”.
The Congress questions the impact of visits abroad by parliamentarians.
The Bharatiya Janata (BJP) party accused the Congress leader, Rahul Gandhi, of a law that is equivalent to “no less than betrayal” after he described the foreign policy of the Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi as a “surrender” after the Sindoor operation, the Indian media reported.
On Wednesday, the president of BJP, JP Nadda, published in X (previously Twitter) that Gandhi’s comments were an insult to the Indian Armed Forces and are equivalent to echo and 140 crore Indians. ” “Surrender” is only a challenge, but also a badge of India to the Indian Army, the Nation and 140 Indian Crass. “” Surrender “is not just a challenge, but also a badge to the Indian army, the nation and 140 crore Indians.”
“This is no less than betrayal,” Nadda added. “Rahul Gandhi, you, your party and your leaders could have surrendered because this has been your story, but Bharat never surrenders.”
In A Series of Sharp Posts, Nadda Accused the Congress Party of A Legacy of Capitulation: “Surrender is in your party congress Water Treaty … and Even Surrendered to The Muslim League at The Time of Independence of the Country. “
Echoing Nadda’s feelings, BJP’s national spokesman, Sudhanshu Trivedi, intensified the attack at a press conference, marked Gandhi as “Rahul Munir” and “Rahul Sharif” and stating that the leader of the Congress had gone beyond even Pakistan’s leadership in the presentation of the position of India.
The BJP counteroffensive occurred in response to the growing criticisms of the Congress and other block parties of India on the management of Foreign Affairs of the Indian government, Pahalgam’s terrorist attack and what they see as an opaque and manipulated narrative around the Sindoor operation.
On Wednesday night, Congress deputy Jairam Ramesh resorted to social networks to aim at the Global Government Dissemination initiative. Referring to the Minister of External Affairs (EAM), Ramesh wrote: “Tomorrow, the unusually under profile EAM meets some MP delegations that have returned. I hope there is an honest evaluation of what was really achieved, not what was seen by turning.”
“There are reliable reports that the welcome in some countries was very warm, to put it softly, and that the political value of the people who completed the parliamentarians were below the pair. The videos of the parliamentarians who get involved in a silly fun and fun, while in a serious national mission they have also been emerging.”
Early the same day, Ramesh had criticized the programming of the government of the next session of the Parliament Monzón, qualifying it as tactics to avoid calling a special session as the opposition demands.
“Never before in the parliamentary history of India a session has been announced 47 days in advance,” he said.
“Why did the Sindoor operation stopped after four days? Why did President Trump repeat 12 times in 20 days that the high fire happened for him? These are the questions that the prime minister does not want to answer.”
The Minister of Parliamentary Affairs of the Union, Kiren Rijiju, had announced that the monsoon session will begin on July 21 and will continue until August 12. It will be the first session from the Sindoor operation.
The demand for a special session was also amplified by the deputy of the Samajwadi Rajeev Rai party, who was part of a delegation of all parties sent by India that recently visited five countries: Russia, Slovenia, Greece, Latvia and Spain.
“PM should have called the special session by itself,” Rai told ANI. “In 1962, when the war against China was in its climax, the deputy for the first time Atal Bihari Vajpayee had demanded a special session in the middle of the war. Nehru Ji had called the special session then … we followed the ‘rashtra dharma’, but the government should continue ‘Raj Dharma'”.
The head of Congress, Mallikarjun Kharge, reiterated the opposition call to a special session to address key national concerns, including Pahalgam’s attack.
Adding fuel to the fire, the leader of the Pawan Khera Congress claimed that India was isolated diplomatically after the operation. “In the Modi government, all policies within the country are being administered by Trolls, and foreign policy abroad is being administered by a person who has surrendered,” he published on social networks.
He affirmed that the diplomatic position of India had weakened, citing Kuwait’s moving to raise visas restrictions to Pakistan and his subsequent agreement with Pakistan in labor matters. “That’s why they say: ‘Name Narendra, Work Surder’,” Khera wrote.
