Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have found themselves taking a hit for the way they’ve lived life since Megxit, and it comes in the form of a Vanity Fair cover story for their February issue.
Royal commentator Daniela Elser referenced it all in her piece for News.com. ouch.
It all started with the expert saying: “The Roman Empire? It lasted 449 years.”
But “the house of Sussex?” Less than five years after Prince Harry and Meghan, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex landed in Los Angeles to boldly go where they hadn’t gone to SRH and things are going down around their ears “.
And the ‘culprit’ as Mrs. Elser calls him, is Vanity Fair February story about the Sussexes and their past dealings with Hollywood producers, employees, a streaming giant and the like.
One aspect that caused a global outcry was accusations against Meghan for being a ‘bad girl’ that would lead to an employee needing “long-term therapy” after terminating her employment, to Prince Harry, who was “painted as a man pathetic. -boy”.
However, this was not rated as the most devastating line because the expert believes that the fact that the writer admits to spending ‘months’ interviewing “dozens of people who have worked and lived alongside the couple” is what does, Since that, since that makes it more than a tabloid hit piece.
In Ms Elser’s eyes, “this report also cannot be written off as the supposedly biased work of the British press with its permanent axis of grinding against the self-styled refugees of Crown Inc.”
What it is, is that “the Vanity Fair name brings with it a degree of journalistic credibility.”
Because before the “piece went to print, it would probably have been scrupulously reviewed by experienced sub-editors and the publication’s legal team would have gotten through this with a fine-toothed comb and a big red pen,” he admitted before concluding.
