Sarah Ferguson has just been called by an expert for the way she delivered the problems with Jeffrey Epstein, as well as for her filtered email.
For those not poured with the whole problem, it relates to an email that the Duchess sent to Jeffrey Epsiten, after it was advised to be publicly distanced from him, for the sake of her career of charity and her future as an author.
What is known is that the house of Hospice Julia de los Niños was the first to cut the ties, then the confidence of adolescent cancer arrived, as well as the beneficial child literacy organization that asked him to renounce herself.
According to Mrs. Platell, all that remains is the new Frontier post that has a book that is launched in joint collaboration with the Duchess, in November of this year. It is titled kindness on the road.
In light of all this, Mrs. Platell wrote a piece for the Daily mail That hit his decision to move forward with email.
“After all, Fergie even admits in his emails apologies to Epstein who only distanced himself from him” to save her own reputation and her career as the author of children. “
With that in the open “no charity executive could read Fergie’s emails and not get to the conclusion that it is now completely beyond the pale. Far from fulfilling its vote of” having nothing to do with Jeffrey Epstein never again, “he resumed contact with him in a few weeks through a series of emails,” MS Platell added.
He even issued a bite of a skilled mockery where he admitted: “You don’t need someone with a mastery in crisis management to realize that emails sound the death of Fergie’s credibility, to the extent that something had left.”
Because in the real world, outside the protections of real associations “if any pattern or CEO of a charity maintained an intimate level of contact with such a sinister and poisonous individual, they would be given their gait orders so fast that their feet would not touch the base,” the expert concluded by saying.
