- VPN providers not liable for copyright infringement, EU Court said
- The Court explicitly recognized VPNs as “legal technical tools”
- The case centered on the copyright battle involving The diary of Anne Frank
In a major victory for digital rights and common sense, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has officially categorized Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) as “technical legal tools”, while setting new limits for online copyright disputes.
The historic ruling, handed down in July 2026, arises from a complex legal battle over the online publication of Anne Frank’s historical manuscripts. In essence, the case forced Europe’s top judges to answer a highly technical question: If a publisher actively tries to block visitors from a specific country, is it still breaking the law if a user crosses the digital border using circumvention software?
According to the CJEU, the answer is no. As long as a website uses “state-of-the-art” geo-blocking technology, the publisher cannot be held liable for copyright infringement simply because a determined reader decides to open the site. The best VPN to bypass restrictions.
The ruling sets an enormous precedent. It confirms that copyright holders cannot claim the mere existence of VPNs to claim that a website’s security measures are completely ineffective.
More importantly for privacy advocates, the court firmly rejected the demonization of privacy software, cementing the legitimate status of VPN providers across the European Union.
The Anne Frank dispute explained
The EU’s top court has just confirmed: geoblocking is a copyright holder’s problem, not the VPN’s. Providers are not responsible for users circumventing restrictions ⚖️ @torrentfreak https://t.co/fLwb5kYAy1July 17, 2026
The legal tug-of-war began when a coalition of Dutch and Belgian academic institutions published a free online academic edition of Anne Frank’s manuscripts.
Because copyright laws are not completely harmonized throughout Europe, the legal status of the famous newspaper varies depending on the territory. In Belgium and approximately 60 other countries, the writings entered the public domain years ago. However, in the Netherlands, parts of the text will remain protected by copyright until 2037.
To respect this territorial division, the publishers hosted the site in Belgium and used geo-blocking to prevent access from Dutch IP addresses. Visitors from the Netherlands received a notice explaining why they could not access the site.
The Anne Frank Fund, which owns the Dutch copyright, filed a lawsuit. They argued that because standard VPNs easily allow users to mask their true IP address and spoof a Belgian location, the academic website was effectively communicating protected work to the Dutch public.
The CJEU ultimately rejected this argument. In its ruling, the court noted that while geo-blocking measures can inevitably be circumvented, “the possibility of such circumvention cannot, in itself and in all the circumstances, be a decisive factor in determining that those measures are inadequate and therefore ineffective.”
Why this is important for Internet and VPN users
For everyday Internet users, the message “So what?” This sentence is deeply reassuring. It validates that using a VPN to encrypt your online traffic, hide your IP address, or bypass digital borders is a legitimate use of consumer technology.
Judges explicitly protected VPN companies from collateral damage in piracy lawsuits, an issue that has sparked intense debate between ISPs and European rights holders. The court specifically argued that the provider of a VPN or similar services is not responsible for users circumventing restrictions.
By imposing the legal burden on publishers to maintain “state-of-the-art” digital barriers, rather than demanding absolute and impossible perfection, the EU has drawn a pragmatic line in the sand.
Publishers are not expected to build walls that are impossible to break, and VPN providers are not responsible for the actions of users who jump over them. Ultimately, this ruling demonstrates that the borderless Internet can still coexist with territorial copyright laws, as long as everyone uses appropriate technical safeguards.
Follow TechRadar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to receive news, reviews and opinions from our experts in your feeds. Be sure to click the Follow button!
