Google has implemented a new purchase function with AI to help you discover how the clothes you are interested in buying when you use it could see. It is called “Test in” and is currently available in the USA. Through Google Search Labs.
To start, you just need to light it in the laboratory. Then, upload a full length photo and start looking for clothes on the Google shopping tab.
When clicking on an image of an outfit of the search results, you will see a small button “try it in” in the middle of the enlarged version of the outfit on the right panel. A click and about ten seconds later, you’ll see the outfit. It may not always be a perfect illusion, but at least you will have an idea of how it would look at you.
Google states that everything runs in a model trained to see the relationship between your body and clothing. The AI can, therefore, drain, stretch and stretch realistically, material in a variety of body types.
The feature does not work with each piece of clothing that can see, or even each type of outfit. The clothing retailer has to opt for the program, and Google said it only works for shirts, pants, dresses and skirts.
I realized that the costumes and bathing suit did not have usable images, but I could put shorts on me, and the costumes that seemed sufficiently usable. The AI also did not seem to have a problem with jackets and coats as categories.
Elvis looks
For example, in Google Shopping, I found replicas of the attire that Elvis used for his return of 1966 and one of his monkeys of the 1970s. With a couple of clicks, I could imagine dressed as the king at different times.
He even changed my shoes with the completely black suit. I had always wondered if I could achieve any aspect. The images can be shared, and can save them or send them to others from the Google Mobile application and see how you think your friends are.
Super Summer
The details that the AI change to make the photos work are impressive. I used the AI to try a fun summer appearance and the closest to a superhero costume that I could try. The original photo is me with a suit and a jacket with a Bowtie and black dress shoes. But shoes and socks in both images generated by the not only coincide with what was in the search result, but are formed to my posture and size.
In addition, despite using long sleeves and pants, AI found a way to show some of my arms and legs. The color coincides with reality, but its imperfections are notable for me. My legs look too thin in both, as I think I skipped legs, and my legs in my shorts have not been so without hair since I turned 13.
Leaving the imperfections aside, it seems that this will be an important part of the next era of electronic commerce. The awkward guess of whether a color or cut works for your skin tone and construction could be easier to solve.
I would not say that it can compensate them in real life, especially when it comes to dimensioning and comfort, but as a digital version of holding an outfit against you while you look in a mirror, it is quite good.
Ending unnecessary returns
Combano, as are some of the resulting images, I think this will be a popular feature for Google Shopping. I would expect the rivals in the development of AI and retail online trade to imitate it strongly, where it is not yet.
I especially like how AI allows you to see how you would look in a more extravagant or bold aspect that could doubt in a store. For example, the country jacket and striped pants to the left or the jacket jacket and the vest with right -wing pants. I would hesitate to order any aspect and almost certainly plan to return one or both before they arrive.
Returns are a pest in online retailers and waste tons of packaging and other resources. But if Google shows us how we would see ourselves in the clothes before buying it, it could move to the return rates; Retailers will compete to register in the program.
I could also open the door to more customized AI -style tips. Soon I could have a personal IA dressing table, ready to give it a virtual adjustment check and suggest its next look, even if it is not something that Elvis would have used.
